Tuesday, July 13, 2010

A Mid-Season Numbers Diversion


Well, we’re halfway through the 2010 NASCAR season and I thought it makes sense to take a hard look at what has transpired, by the numbers.

First off, here are the current Top 20 Chase Standing Drivers:
(thru the July 10th race in Joliet, Illinois)


I wonder how these standings would look if we made just one slight change to the system… Let’s award the drivers one point for every lap they’ve led during the first 19 races of the season:


It surprised me that after adding almost 6,000 points to the standings mix the results really didn’t change that much. The major difference being the larger gap between the top drivers. In the current system 400 points separate first from tenth place while in the revised system (which I believe rewards drivers to a higher level for not sitting on their laurels) the gap between first and tenth grew to over 500 points more to 954. Kasey Kahne would been the recepient of the most benefit from the revised system. Kasey made a leap from 17th to 10th in the Chase while Carl Edwards (with only four, that’s right, count 'em only four lead laps in 19 races!) drops out. The revised point system reshuffled the leading drivers with le creme de le creme rising to the top.

So far 64 drivers have driven a Sprint Cup car this season but only 46 have taken the lead at any one time. Here are the top twenty-five:


Look at all the drivers up there with more laps led than Carl Edwards. There are another 13 (including Boris Said and Mattias Ekstrom, two road course drivers) before you find Uncle Carl with 4…


Kristen, you oughta like those stats!

The problem is NASCAR wants to know how that damned Dodge is doin' it!

And Jon, did you see that Joe Nemechek has actually led two(!) laps!


Along the lines of the start and park folks, here are the top drivers in terms of laps completed per start followed by the drivers who are constantly breaking down (or is it wrecking?)...


Taking the laps led data one step further. Here’s how the teams stack up:



The average laps led per team is really telling...

And then look at laps led by Manufacturer:

---MAKE-------------LAPS LED------#of TEAMS-------AVE./TEAM
1. Dodge ---------------875---------------4 -----------------218.75
2. Chevrolet----------2,919 -------------17------------------171.71
3. Toyota ------------1,453 -------------14------------------103.79
4. Ford----------------554 -------------12------------------46.17

What’s up with Ford? Now I know these people have got great engineers making great equipment for an excellent group of drivers, so what gives? This is way out of line.


________________________________________


How about a look at where the rubber really meets the road – The Money:

(Here are the top drivers in terms of total earnings and then average earnings per start)


Out of these numbers came a surprise. Look at which team is out-performing all others where it counts:

Evidently Earnhardt-Ganassi Racing is gettin' the hits when they need to, when the big money is on the line... Those teams averaging better than $2.5 million (if that $5 million figure is accurate these days) will be running a profitable operation if they continue through the rest of the year as they have the first half.

____________________________________________


In a different look at numbers, here is a rating of the drivers in terms of starting position and finishing position:


(35 Drivers with over 4,000 laps of racing were used)

Here are the top 10 drivers moving through the field toward a good finish in 2010 ---------Drivers moving up took the following numbers off of their starting positions:


1.-----Kevin Harvick -9.737
2.-----Travis Kvapil -9.556
3.-----Kevin Conway -8.222
4.-----Matt Kenseth -7.368
5.-----Robby Gordon -6.706
6.-----David Gilliland -6.125
7.------Carl Edwards -4.947
8.----Bobby Labonte -3.579
9.---------Greg Biffle -3.526
10.----Denny Hamlin -3.368

-------Then there are the drivers moving down. Add the following numbers to their starting positions and that's where they've been finishing:

26.---Marcos Ambrose 2.737
27.---------Joe Logano 3.842
28.------Mark Martin 4.053
29.--Jamie McMurray 4.579
30.-------Kurt Busch 4.842
31.---Sam Hornish Jr. 5.053
32.----Ryan Newman 5.737
33.--Jimmie Johnson 5.789
34.-----Kasey Kahne 6.895
35.-Juan Pablo Montoya 7.053

Looking at these numbers makes me wonder what EGR could be doing money-wise with a driver that moves up, not down (sounds like one of those gold commercials... And it's supposed to!) When's Juan's contract run out?

Finally, Here is how the top drivers have performed in terms of finishes:


Is it going to be more of the same or will someone named Kevin or Kurt of Kyle or Tony or ???? break the spell?

Time will tell...


There will be more number crunching in the future... Hope you have enjoyed this look at what our boys are doing.

I do want to apologize for the quality of those spreadsheets. Someday maybe they'll figure out how to tranfer that kind of work to a blog... For a number cruncher like me it would sure be nice!

10 comments:

  1. Hey Dwindy!

    I am not a numbers gal - hence the psych degree - but there are few instances where numbers cannot be taken out of context.

    On the money earned - JMac winning the 500 was the richest race to be had all year so there is no way EGR can keep up that earnings pace and it does skew the numbers a lot. Wondering if Kurt's All Star Million is included in that total? Seems like it cannot be...

    Another point that has to be taken in context - when you start up front you alot (aka Kurt) then your numbers moving during the race are skewed - adding 5 positions to an often top 5 starting spot is no big for Kurt keeping him in the top 10 nearly every race.

    Finally - the fact that Kurt is leading laps lead and Dodge is kicking butt with essentially one driver (BK and Sam have not produced at Cup level) it is even more impressive what my Brew Crew is doing this year.

    Way to make me think Dwindy!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dwindy, it is surprising that before the Chicagoland race, Start and Park Joe led as many laps as Cousin Carl! (Carl led two laps in Chicago, doubling his number to four, but STILL less than Mattias Eckstrom. I wonder if Carl will catch Eckstrom's total?)

    Great read! I'll be bleeding numbers now for the next few days!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Kristen!

    Didn't mean to ruffle your feathers!

    Let's see... The money deal. This is a part of NASCAR that I guess will never change, the varying payouts for different races and it definitely skews the money numbers, but what are ya gonna do?

    No,the dollars earned do not include the All-Star race winnings. It's straight up for the 19 regular races to date this season.

    As far as when a driver starts and when he finishes, the variation in numbers can also be laid on the fact that some drivers are really good at qualifying (Montoya?) but aren't that good driving in traffic. Plus it's not just the driver, it's all sorts of things that can go wrong (or right) that determine where they finish. Kurt's average starting position this year has been 8.632 (between 8th and 9th), while his average finishing position has been 13.474. For a comparison, Jeff Gordon's numbers are 9.632 (Start) and 11.211 (Finish). Given those numbers Harvicks' numbers (19.211 & 9.474)
    are really something.

    Finally Kurt IS Penske. Sam and Brad oughta start an ice cream company or something when compared to the Big Busch! LOL

    Numbers are numbers and they can be massaged all sorts of ways although I don't feel I was trying to massage them. I was just reporting my findings and all the while aware that they can be taken more than one way.

    Thanks Kristen!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Jon!

    As I commented above I'm not sure what's going on with Ford. Edwards is just part of the problem. Look at Kenseth and Biffle or Kahne with Petty. None of them have been to victory lane. Who knows, maybe Jack Roush has told his boys to tone it down and not wreck so many cars (the economy?). I do know King Richard isn't happy (or the Dinger for that matter!).

    Ford is sure talkin' up their new engine. We'll see.

    Thanks Jon!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Very interesting and informative, dude.

    One problem with using a lap led bonus to show where drivers WOULD be if it was in use, is that those laps led would not be the same if drivers WERE getting points for them. In other words, if Carl knew he was getting points for leading laps... I believe he would have led more than four by now.

    T'm all for giving points for each lap led, but one per lap is too many for me. A driver could lead 480 laps at Bristol, blow an engine, finish 35th, and still receive more than twice as many points as the winner. I'd say a tenth of a point for each lap led.

    Really like the way you crunch this stuff out for us slackers, man!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Hey Dwindy! No feathers ruffled here just trying to make sense of stats! =) I learned doing my dissertation that you can make numbers mean anything so I am always looking for what they mean in context!

    Love it that someone does the stats again - you've officially taken over for JJ Dean!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gene, I was thinking about the laps led deal too. How about this: Daytona, Talladega, Indianapolis, Pocono and Watkins Glen = 1 point per lap. 1.5 - 2 mile tracks = 1/2 point & anything less than 1.5 miles = 1/4 point. That would level it out and still be simple to figure.

    I agree that if the driver's knew points were there for the offing, they'd be standin' on that pedal!

    It's clear to me that something's gotta be done to stimulate NASCAR...

    Hey, I left a website address to get to the HOF voting site for next year's inductees. Pretty sure us peons don't count for much, but it's fun to vote...

    Thanks Gene!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Klvalus,

    I was hoping I got your dander up! LOL

    You oughta see my football stats!

    I'll figure out how to crunch NASCAR's numbers and in the process I'll learn all sorts of things, some good and some not so much. That's how I roll!

    (I knew you weren't upset!)

    Thanks alot!

    ReplyDelete
  9. woohoo, stats! :D

    they make Marcos look better than he's currently running....I like that, Dwindy ;)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hey tez!

    This sport lends itself to stats, but there are so many variables (like the amounts each race pays out) it makes evaluating tough (kinda like shrimpin' in the Gulf right now...).

    I'll keep playing with the numbers. Maybe we can come up with a new points system that rewards winning and leading to a higher degree so that some of these drivers will actually get out there and go for the gusto!

    Thanks tez!

    ReplyDelete